The Winning Recipes!

Our office recently hosted an in-house Chili Competition & Margarita Mix-Off. At the end of the evening, Daniel took home the prize for ‘Best Chili’ while Heera claimed the title for ‘Best Margarita’! Recipes below:

Spicy Cadillac Margarita — Heera Basi


-Grand Marnier



1) Fill glass about 1/2 way with ice
2) Into the glass squeeze juice from 1 lime
3) Stir in 1-2 shots of Tequila (depending on how strong you like it! My recipe has about 1 1/2 shots) and 1 shot of Cointreau
5) You could stop here and enjoy!
6) Add a float of Grand Marnier on top to make it a “Cadillac” Margarita
7) Add 1-3 Jalapeno slices to give it a kick! Drink will start out mild, but the heat will build!

Green Chicken Chili – Daniel Holbrook

-3 Poblano peppers
-4 Jalapeño peppers
-1 ½” pounds of Tomatillos
-1 onion
-5 cloves of garlic
-1 beer (similar to Corona or Pacifica)
-1 cup of sour cream
-2 cans of Cannellini Beans
-2 cups of Chicken broth
-1 ½” pounds of boneless skinless chicken thigh
-1 tablespoon of Cumin
-1 teaspoon Chile powder
-1/2 teaspoon of smoked paprika
-1/2 teaspoon or coriander
-1 teaspoon of honey
-salt and pepper to taste



1) Place Tomatillos, Poblanos and Jalapeños on a baking sheet and place under the broiler until skin is soft and blistered (10 minutes) Remove from oven.  Cover and let cool.
2) Once peppers and tomatillos are cool, remove blistered skin, Seed and rib the peppers and chop.
3) Season chicken with salt, pepper and a half teaspoon of Cumin.  In a heavy bottom pot, sear the chicken until brown on both sides.  Remove chicken and set aside.
4) Add onion and garlic to pot, sauté until translucent.  Add remaining Cumin and other spices, sauté until spices are fragrant.  Add beer to deglaze the pan.
5) Add Tomatillos and Jalapeno’s to the pot along with 2 cups of chicken broth (Save Poblano’s to add later).
6) Return chicken thighs to the pot to finish cooking.
7) Allow soup to simmer for 30-60 minutes.
8) Once simmered, remove chick thighs, then blend soup with an immersion blender.  Slowly stir in sour cream
9) Chop chicken thighs, return chicken to pot.  Add the Beans and Poblanos.  Let simmer for 20-30 minutes.
10) To thicken soup (if needed), remove some broth and beans and blend with immersion blender, then return it to the pot.

Add salt, pepper, honey, and lime to taste.
Serve topped with chopped cilantro and sour cream.

Bye For Now Parker!

What a summer it’s been. Full of challenges, new opportunities and downright shenanigans. I can definitely say that I’ve learned so much and enjoyed my time here at Feldman Architecture.

From day one I dived headfirst into the professional world of architecture. Client meetings, marketing plans and renderings threw me right into the daily routine of an architect, and trust me when I say it has been an absolute blast. I had to push myself every day to think critically and creatively, to iterate, and take feedback in every project. My tasks ranged from redesigning the firm’s SketchUp libraries, project renderings and drawings, all the way to editing photos from the amazing Open House at the beginning of the summer.

Along the way I had an incredible group of people helping me learn new skills, new programs, and helping me figure out the vernacular of architecture. I learned so much about what it means to be an architect in the professional world, lessons that I’m sure will be with me and that I will treasure for the rest of my career.

Thanks again to everyone at Feldman Architecture for their unparalleled kindness and for being so welcoming, I hope to see you all again soon.

Cheers and all the best,

-Parker D. Klebahn


Staff Spotlight: Lindsey Theobald

Q: Where are you from?

I’m from Napa, California, not far from here. The place I grew up has a small town feel, everybody knew everybody and everybody’s parents were friends. My house growing up was next to a creek and my sister and I used to explore it all the time. I remember my parents always going with their friends to the surrounding wineries and I would hate it and refuse to leave the car. But now it’s nice that it’s close by since I can visit often as a getaway.

Q: Where did you go to school?

Cal poly, where I studied architecture. The school is unique in that you have to declare a major when you apply, so I decided to become an architect at 17. Luckily it stuck. In my first year, I joined an optional class that was pretty computer heavy. It got into InDesign and modeling, before the advent of all the super cool modeling we use today.

I really started to enjoy my major in my 3rd year. The studios got more competitive and we all started vying for certain teachers, as it really mattered what teacher you got. In my 4th year everyone went abroad; I went to Denmark, which was amazing. Even though the school was all American, I lived in student housing with Danes. The dorms weren’t connected to the school, they were just housing for a multitude of students nearby. 5th year was thesis year and I ended up getting my favorite professor, which was great.

CalPoly always felt like a quintessential “California” school.  We biked everywhere, had big backyard BBQ house parties, hit up reggae night downtown on Wednesdays, and really enjoyed the small-town feel of SLO.  That said, studying a whole year in Europe and traveling practically everywhere throughout the continent was a welcome reprieve to the small town life I’d lived so far.  Best of both worlds.

Q: Tell me about your family.

I have a mom, dad, and sister all close by. I have two kids, eight and five with the younger one turning six in august. My husband, who’s a landscape architect, I met at Cal Poly. I’m super fortunate to have my mom drive all the way from Napa three days a week to watch my kids after school.  My family is super close, so it feels natural to have my mom and dad be a big part of my kids’ lives.  I have a big extended family too and we try to get together as much as possible, whether it’s big trips to Kauai or quick weekend trips to celebrate graduations.  We all just got back from my sister’s ranch near the Sequoia National Forest.  My kids are obsessed with my cousins’ kids, so it’s constant fun whenever we all get together.  The rest of my family is very musical, so there is always a lot of playing instruments and singing when we all get together.  I’m hoping the gift of musical talent rubs off on my kids.  Or at least singing on key.

Q: When did you first develop an interest in architecture?

I guess my interest started in high school since I declared that as my major on my Cal Poly application. I applied for biology in all other schools except that one. I don’t remember what I thought I was going to do with biology, but I think I went for architecture because it was pretty specific and it seemed to be more exciting and defined. There wasn’t the typical “I love lego” phase or anything like that. I just liked design. I never took any art classes, so I wasn’t hugely artistic but I remember my mom and I designing my room all the time; rearranging the furniture, choosing the colors, and I found that to be super fun. I was into coloring and mixing patterns, just general childlike creativity.

What kinds of projects do you most enjoy working on?

I’m not specifically interested in the size or budget necessarily, but I really enjoy working with people who are willing to take more risks and or try some cool designs rather than play it safe. I love it when clients get excited about some crazy light fixture, finish, or piece of furniture that I’ve found. It comes down to the clients, not the project type or budget, but whether or not the homeowners are going to join me in taking them down this wild path to a unique project at the end.

Q: How long have you worked at FA?

Since 2006. I was practicing architecture in San Diego before I moved here. That company has since moved to Colorado as they weren’t into SoCal politics. Besides that brief stint after college this is basically my one and done career.

Q: What makes our office unique?

I think it’s the lack of ego, which drives Jonathan to always pay close attention to who he hires. He bases a large part of his decision on personality and making sure our office culture stays collaborative, fun, and humble. He’s always done a good job of doing that. It’s more fluid now that we’re bigger than it was back then. For five years I worked with the same five people, so it’s nice to see some new faces and learn from all the new experiences and varied backgrounds they bring.

Q: What’s your favorite part about coming to work?

I’m never too bummed about the tasks I have to do or the projects I’m working on, plus the people are fun to be around. I fundamentally agree with the way we approach design and work and I don’t feel like I’m coming to some place where I have to battle against others’ opinions. The office feels like a good nurturing community. Every day I’m always finding different ways to grow that I wasn’t expecting, whether it’s focusing on helping colleagues, learning from them, or collaborating with team members.

Q: Do you have a professional role model?

Well, Patricia Urquiola kicks butt.  I took notice of her after I realized that every furniture piece or tile I was liking was of her design.  I appreciate her celebration of colors and texture.  She can be modern without having the negative connotations that occasionally go with  the term: like sleek, cold, and sterile.  She can use a huge range of colors, a multi-hued palette, and still have her pieces feel neutral and timeless.  Same with textures – her textures can be so outrageous, but on her specific pieces, they feel just right.  I also appreciate that she took her design sensibilities from architecture into product design and interiors.  She must have fun getting to design every little thing.

Another favorite of mine is John Pawson.  Quite on the other end of the spectrum from Patricia Urquiola.  His interiors are the epitome of minimal, but a minimalism that is so appealing because of the strong emphasis on materiality.  A room of his design can be empty, but it still feel inviting because of the rich materials he uses –textured concrete; smooth wood with tight detailing; and natural light softening white walls and ceilings.  The combination of pretty natural materials with crisp detailing is effective.

Q: What’s your design process like?

I’m visual, so I love looking at images of things on Pinterest or other websites. I find a lot of inspiration in images first and often ask for reference images from the client.  Then I know what look and feel we are trying to achieve.  Images are pretty effective for interior projects, which make up a large part of my work.  It’s an effective way for the client to share their vision or ideal aesthetic with me and vice versa.  Once I have a clear idea of the look and feel, I try to figure out the material palette.  I get the physical materials in front of me before moving forward. We’re constantly getting new materials for our office library that I (try to!) organize and keep up to date.  The new library is so lovely and I feel like a kid in a candy store here!

Q: What’s the nicest compliment you’ve ever been given?

My husband just told me that I’m emotionally mature.  Meaning that I am thoughtful in my reactions to others. That kind of blew me away, especially since I’m not always mature in my reactions towards him!  But, I do tend to see the best in others and that leads to more positive interactions.  I think it’s really important to give people the benefit of the doubt.  I’m an optimist!

Q: Where is your favorite spot to go in the city?

It’s different to think about because my experiences right now are through my kids. I love taking them on the ferry here and then going exploring around the city. It’s stress free! I can get a drink on the ferry and relax, plus the kids love the thrill of the ride. We are members of the Exploratorium, so we’ve spent many a weekend there.  For restaurants, I’m partial to the Presidio Social Club, especially if you get to sit on the back patio.  A glass of wine plus their fries and aioli and I’m set!

‘Paris is Always a Good Idea’

By Bianca Mills

“There are two kinds of travelers. There is the kind who goes to see what there is to see, and the kind who has an image in his head and goes out to accomplish it. The first visitor has an easier time, but I think the second visitor sees more.” – Paris to the Moon, Adam Gopnik

I have always valued the experience of traveling alone and in May I went to Paris by myself for a week.  I had been to Paris twice before and on those trips I had lit candles in the Sacre Coeur and watched the sunset from its steps overlooking the city, visited the graves of my favorite artists resting in Pere Lachaise and walked through the expansive tunnels taking in the gravity of the history of the Catacombs.  This trip was a somewhat spontaneous venture for the gluttonous purposes of beauty, solitude, food & drink, as well as finally making it to Versailles.

This time around I was more comfortable trying to use my high school level French. My ‘bonjour’ must have been pretty convincing because I got full rambling sentences as a response on my first day, thus abruptly ending the fantasy that I am practically bilingual.  I had rented an apartment on a side street near St. Sulpice in the 6th arrondissement. Arriving jetlagged and happy, I spent my first night having dinner at a familiar place, Les Antiquaires, the restaurant where I had spent my 40th birthday on my previous trip.  I tucked into a small table between a group of Canadians celebrating birthdays and a group of Austrians on a layover, all of whom would soon adopt me and befriend each other.  A few of them individually shared their stories with me of visits to San Francisco, a love affair that ended in Paris, and the hope of a new baby. As new friends, we wrapped up our dinner by inflicting a red wine saturated version of ‘Que Sera Sera’ on the other patrons, which seemed totally appropriate at the time.  That night, I walked back to my apartment in misty rain with no umbrella, a relaxed smile and tired, happy tears running down my face.  It was the kind of magic that I regularly only imagine.  It was charmed.  It was perfect.

My first two full days in Paris were quiet.  It was over a holiday and most of the city was closed.  The weather was beautiful so I just walked.  I went through the 6th and 7th arrondissement.  Rue Cler was one of few streets where shops and cafes were bustling despite the holiday.

The following day I had breakfast at Café Panis and watched the people crossing the Pont au Double bridge to line up in front of Notre Dame. I visited the Maison Europeenne de la Photographie and took my time looking through the galleries of photographs.

My nephews wanted to FaceTime during my trip so they could see the Eiffel Tower live from San Francisco.  So I made a date with them at midnight one night and stood at its foot as it twinkled and glowed.

Me: “I arranged for it to twinkle during our call’.

Nephews: “Really?!”

Me: “No. That’s just what it does every night because it’s Paris and it’s beautiful and I love it here because Paris is magic’.

Café de Flore was a famous gathering place for writers and painters of past times primed for a revolution.  It was 4 blocks from my apartment and it was always a good place to start or finish the day.  I would alternate between Café de Flore, Mabillon and Café de la Mairie just down the street on the square of St. Sulpice.  I’m sure at a certain point, I went to all three in one day.

All that time spent in cafes was my chance to write in my travel journal and finally read a book my cousin gave to me years ago, Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing & Life written by Anne Lamott.  It was the perfect book for the trip.  It was a metaphor for life, about a process that relies on perseverance despite an internal dialog of imminent failure. It rescues the process with a little blind faith and just enough of my kind of dry humor.

“ I stood there feeling very shy and self-conscious and pleased. Then I said, ‘Do you think it makes my hips look too big?’ and she said to me slowly, ‘Annie? I really don’t think you have that kind of time.’

It’s true.  We really don’t have that kind of time. A realization too easily saved for twice a year in a place far from home, but I keep trying.

My last full day, I finally made it to Versailles.  I am always wary of tourist traps on vacation after living in San Francisco for so long but Versailles is truly awe-inspiring. The grand presence of it from the bottom of the uneven stone street hill was worth just standing there for a few minutes to admire even though people were piling up in front and I didn’t know where I was supposed to get a ticket or which long line was for what.  Another great part of traveling alone is that you decide on your own what is worth a rush.

The gardens are poised to spend an entire day enjoying on their own.  Classical music played from hidden speakers and families picnicked along the greens.  I walked along the corridors of trees and finally sat on the stairs overlooking the parterres of the garden to take it all in.

That night I decided to go back to Les Antiquaires.  By coincidence I was seated at the same table with the same waiter who remembered me from my first night.  He told me that if I ever wanted to make a reservation for that specific table it is table eight.  Eight happens to be my numerology life path number.  It represents balance, harmony and trust in one’s self.  It mirrors the symbol of infinity.  It has always been a lucky number for me.  Of course it was table 8!  I told him it was my last night in Paris so unfortunately I would not be needing a reservation.  When I got up from my table to leave, I caught his eye and said goodbye. As I walked out the door he waved and said, ‘have a safe trip back to San Francisco’!  Good bye for now Paris..

Staff Spotlight: Chris Kay

Q: Where are you from?

I grew up in Birmingham, Alabama where I spent the majority of my life. It’s a small metropolitan area surrounded by five very suburban areas. Most people, myself included, grew up in those surrounding suburbs because the city was vacant and dangerous. Over the past ten years or so they’ve implemented a lot of money back into the city, lighting up tunnels, opening parks, bars, restaurants etc, which has made it a lot safer and a more enjoyable place to live. Now nearly everyone is fighting over property to be a part of its tremendous growth.

Q: Where did you go to school?

After high school I attended the University of Alabama at Birmingham for two years perusing a BFA in graphics design. In 2012 I transferred from UAB into the architecture program at Auburn University where I later graduated. I also had some summer stints at Jefferson State due to the fact that none of my credits transferred from UAB to Auburn.

Q: Who is in your family?

I’m the youngest of four kids – two brothers and one sister – all stubborn and raised under the world’s strongest mother. We also had a feisty little Lhasa Apso named Max. Everyone, excluding me, was born in Ruston Louisiana where my parents met. We live all over now with our partners – four are in Nashville, two in Nebraska, and my parents both live in Birmingham. Myself and my gorgeous lady moved out here to the bay in 2017. My family means the world to me.

Q: When did you first develop an interest in architecture?

Like many, I always had an interest in building things. But I never really had a plan of implementing those interests until I took a 3D sculpture studio at UAB. The professor had a unique way of looking at the world. The first day of studio he spoke about objects, and how their quality could be measured by the effect of their presence – or the way they effected the space surrounding them. Not an original thought necessarily but it really resonated with me. So much so that I set up a time to speak with him later that week. That conversation is where I learned of his previous career in architecture. After that I figured I should look further into the profession.

Q: What kinds of projects do you most enjoy working on?

I haven’t really had enough experience in architecture to pinpoint any particular area of interest but I know right now I’m most interested in the smaller details and the accuracy involved in their design.  I like working with my hands—any tangible problem will keep me occupied and interested well past sleep deprivation.

Q: How long have you worked at FA?

I started in early March of 2018.

Q: What makes our office unique?

My initial draw to Feldman was due to the work the company does in the residential field. Looking through the projects, there was a clear indication of uninterrupted atmosphere. There’s this unique balance between the effect of the building on its environment, and an environment on the building—I appreciated that honesty in design. But after visiting the office for the first time, the all-around engaging attitude of each person I met sealed my fate. What makes Feldman so unique is the people who work here. Everyone is incredibly intelligent and it’s exciting to come to work every day with the ability to learn from your peers.

Q: What’s your favorite part about coming to work?

Aside from my previous answer; the opportunity to see up to three doggos at one time.

Q: What do you like to do for fun outside of the office?

I like to build things. I also like rock climbing and soccer. I enjoy working on mechanical things too, specifically motorcycle engines though I don’t have a motorcycle anymore. I built two bikes the year prior to moving out here; five days before I moved I finally got one of them running. But I had to sell them both before I left Birmingham. When my girlfriend and I left Alabama we sold everything we had. We put the remainder of our stuff in a 4×4 carriage, shipped it off, and flew out here. So if anyone out there wants to donate a bike…

Q: Do you have a professional role model?

The person who has taught me the most is a long haired Fabio-esque man named Kyle D-Agostino, also known as “The Sausage Emperor”. I say this reluctantly knowing that if he ever reads this article, his boastuous nature will never let me forget it. Kyle was the architectural director at Appleseed Workshop where I worked before moving to the bay area. He taught me a lot in both architecture and in life.

Q: What’s your design process like?

I think the way to design anything is to first identify the problem. Then boil that problem down to its fundamentals and start from there. This is the easiest way for me to understand something well enough to confidently design a solution.

Q: What piece of advice would you give your younger self having lived your life up until now?

Read more than The Iceberg Hermit.

Living Future ’18: Designing Solutions

By Ben Welty

This past May I had the opportunity to travel to Portland, Oregon, to attend the Living Future 2018 unConference, an annual gathering, now in its 12 year, that is hosted by the International Living Future Institute (ILFI). The ILFI is best known as the administers of the sustainable design certification program, The Living Building Challenge (LBC), which is widely considered the most difficult green building certification to achieve. A Seattle based collaborative, they’ve emerged on the scene in recent years as a challenger to the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) and it’s more commonly known green building certification program, LEED.

While still somewhat considered grassroots in relative comparison to the scale of the USGBC and LEED, as interest and participation in the LBC has grown, so has the reputation of the ILFI and the conference itself. The quantity and diversity of the seminars was evidence of this, as the content avoided going stale and structured themes afforded attendees the opportunity to define their own paths without fear of getting lost in the shuffle of what can sometimes feel like convention center musical chairs. Taking this approach I chose to hone my focus on the somewhat familiar but complex topic of water conservation and policy, while also exploring the less commonly known field of Biophilic Design.

The water issue is complex. It’s the only necessity of life for which humans are in direct competition with every living organism that surrounds us. Compounding this are the difficulties we seem to face when it is made abundant, as it oftentimes remains unsuitable or insufficient for human consumption. 11% of the world’s population are currently without access to clean water while 25% do not have access to proper sanitation. Yet even in the most arid of places we’ve learned to harness it, treat it, consume it and release it back into the environment in a symbiotic relationship with land not necessarily suitable for human habitation. So why the struggle?

Simply put, we have the tools to solve the issue of water scarcity but our policies and practices do not currently support this. These points were made clear as one after another passionate speakers made their cases for water conservation, policy and equity, each noble in cause and abundant in information. However, there did seem to be a lack of a common thread between the extremes of the spectrum to tie it all together. For instance, I could not help but feel a disconnect between the conversations surrounding the obstacles of building modern, private residences in arid climates and the struggles of the city of Detroit as they deal with a public water crisis in their marginalized communities. This underscored a social chasm that is the widening gap of privilege vs. poverty, an issue that is manifesting itself at local, national and global levels. But this in no way diminishes the importance of the individual conversations themselves, because as world populations continue to grow and climate change tightens its grip, water scarcity is quickly becoming one of the most pressing issues of the 21st century.

One possible design solution to this growing problem could be found in the concepts of biophilic design, whose modern incarnation is still somewhat emerging in the broader field of sustainable design. I found Living Future ‘18 to be a great platform for these concepts, as I imagine this group is far too often passed off as hippies-cum-scientists selling the idea of nautilus shell living as a means to saving the planet. But that would be cliché, as its core tenets that combine nature and design in order replicate natural processes in the built environment have shaped a movement that, for the most part, has avoided its mission coming off too literal (Read more about biophilic design and the ILFI’s initiative HERE). This point was made clear at the beginning of nearly every seminar I attended on the subject, a sign that they’re conscious that the stigma still exists. That said, the content by and large proved otherwise and as building technology advances and sustainable living engrains itself into the social conscious, it’s predictable that these interests would be widely embraced by the design community. The results of this is a broad catalogue of well-designed, contemporary buildings whose numbers continue to grow. No longer is “good design” exempt from incorporating sustainable features. In fact, good design and sustainable design are becoming synonymous, if we’re not there already. So, moving forward, I’m anxious to see whether or not biophilic design assimilates into our contemporary design language as fluidly as sustainable design has over the past two decades.

While the breadth of the Living Future conference pales in comparison to the USGBC’s annual Greenbuild Conference, the quality, knowledge and passion of the speakers did not fail to impress. And though this year’s group of exhibiting product vendors leaves much to be desired, I trust that the list of participants will become more robust in the years to come as more manufacturers survive the strict vetting process that is a perquisite to attending. So, as the ILFI and its unConference enter its formative teenage years, I anticipate (and hope) that the next step in its growth will be largely subsidized by the design and building industries themselves, as it continues to undergo the transition from admirable ideology to established principle.